Door to Freedom

Door to Freedom is a small U.S. nonprofit founded in 2023 by physician and researcher Meryl Nass. Its stated mission is to help people understand changes in global governance, oppose efforts by the World Health Organization and United Nations to centralize control during emergencies, and preserve traditional farming and the production of healthy food.

Unlike organizations that seek only to reform individual public-health policies, Door to Freedom questions the broader system: who finances international health institutions, who writes emergency rules, how private foundations influence public policy, and how much authority should be transferred from individuals and national legislatures to international bodies.

What Door to Freedom Does

The organization maintains research and educational resources covering:

• WHO treaties and the International Health Regulations;
• UN initiatives and the “Great Reset” agenda;
• pandemic preparedness and the global biosecurity industry;
• vaccine development and emergency authorization;
• central bank digital currencies and financial surveillance;
• threats to independent farmers and traditional food production;
• federal and state legislation related to health, food and individual rights.

Its website contains short summaries, longer analyses, videos, legislative trackers, copies of primary documents and practical materials for citizens and lawmakers. Door to Freedom has also organized symposiums on food and farming and operates Save Our Food and Farms as one of its projects.

This is not a formally libertarian think tank. Nevertheless, its emphasis on decentralization, informed consent, freedom of speech, national sovereignty and resistance to coercive emergency powers closely overlaps with libertarian principles.

The organization has also openly stated that the MAGA and MAHA movements are broadly compatible with its work. It therefore should not be presented as politically neutral in the ordinary sense, although its registered purpose is education and public-policy analysis rather than electoral campaigning.

Why Its Work Matters

Door to Freedom focuses particular attention on the influence of large private foundations within institutions that exercise public-policy power.

The concern is not based solely on speculation. The Gates Foundation has committed more than $4 billion to Gavi and holds a permanent seat on Gavi’s board. CEPI states that it was founded in Davos by the governments of Norway and India, the Gates Foundation, Wellcome and the World Economic Forum. WHO itself acknowledges that less than one quarter of its financing comes from mandatory member-state contributions, with the remainder largely raised through voluntary contributions.

These relationships do not by themselves prove wrongdoing. They do, however, create legitimate questions about accountability, donor influence and the role of unelected private institutions in shaping international health policy. Door to Freedom exists to investigate and publicize those questions from a perspective rarely represented by governments, large universities or mainstream media.

Founder and Controversy

Meryl Nass has worked on anthrax, biological warfare, vaccine safety and pandemic policy and has testified before Congress on several occasions. She became a prominent critic of COVID-era mandates, mass vaccination policies and restrictions on early treatment.

The Maine Board of Licensure in Medicine suspended her medical license and subsequently found violations involving patient care, recordkeeping and misrepresentation. The Board’s official account should be read alongside Nass’s position: she argues that the proceedings were politically motivated and has pursued legal action against the Board.

Supporters view the case as an example of professional punishment for dissent. Critics consider the disciplinary findings evidence that her medical conclusions should be treated cautiously. Potential donors should be aware of both interpretations.

Financial Position

Door to Freedom is a tax-exempt 501(c)(3) organization with EIN 93-2542238. It has been federally tax-exempt since November 2023.

According to the latest available IRS Form 990 data, covering 2025:

• total revenue was $200,918;
• total expenses were $83,812;
• year-end net assets were $209,509;
• reported liabilities were $0;
• all reported revenue came from contributions;
• no salaries or wages were reported;
• President Meryl Nass, Treasurer Samuel May and Secretary Brook Delorme each received $0 in reported compensation.

For comparison, the organization received $252,936 and spent $228,288 in 2024. Its 2025 spending therefore fell substantially, while its financial reserve increased.

This means Door to Freedom is not presently an emergency rescue case. Its year-end assets were approximately two and a half times its 2025 expenses. Nevertheless, it remains a very small organization dependent on donations rather than commercial revenue, government contracts or a large endowment. A modest donor can have considerably more influence here than at a multimillion-dollar institution.

The public Form 990 data does not reveal the identities of most underlying donors. It is therefore impossible to verify from public records alone whether its funding is broadly distributed or concentrated among a few private benefactors. Before making a large donation, it would be reasonable to ask which current project needs funding and what the organization plans to produce in 2026.

Important Limitations

Door to Freedom publishes a mixture of original research, opinion, curated documents and articles republished from partner organizations. The evidentiary quality is not identical across every page. Supporting the organization should not mean accepting every headline or prediction without verification.

It is also important to distinguish earlier WHO proposals from the text ultimately adopted. The 2025 WHO Pandemic Agreement expressly states that it does not give the WHO Secretariat authority to impose national laws, lockdowns or vaccination mandates. Door to Freedom itself acknowledged that several of the most objectionable provisions proposed during negotiations were absent from the final 2024 International Health Regulations amendments.

The remaining debate concerns indirect influence, financing, surveillance infrastructure, national implementation, future amendments and the political pressure created by internationally coordinated policy—not a literal power enabling WHO officials to order every government to lock down its population.

Should You Support Door to Freedom?

Door to Freedom is a strong candidate for support if your priorities include:

• resistance to centralized global governance;
• medical choice and informed consent;
• scrutiny of WHO, UN, Gavi, CEPI and Gates Foundation influence;
• protection of independent farmers and traditional food;
• opposition to financial and digital surveillance;
• preservation of national and individual decision-making.

It is independent, comparatively small and unusually direct about the institutions it challenges. Its financial reporting shows no executive compensation or debt, although its accumulated reserve means donors should support it for the value of specific work rather than from a belief that it is about to disappear.

The most sensible form of support would be a modest recurring donation, combined with continued scrutiny of its sources and output.

Donations can be made by credit card or check through the organization’s official donation page. U.S. contributions are tax-deductible to the extent permitted by law.